Talk:Manual of Exalted Power: Dragon-Blooded

From Fixalted
Jump to: navigation, search

Any particular reason this page is designed different from the Lunars? I don't want to wholesale change it, but I will input that I prefer the Lunars style of a separate "Problem - Suggested Fixes" page. It allows for more discussion and multiple fixes. If no one disagrees, I'll change it up tomorrow sometime. -MavrikGandalf 22:54, 13 October 2007 (PDT)

EDIT: Actually, I'm an idiot. Don't mind me. (Just checked the Core page.) >.< -MavrikGandalf 22:57, 13 October 2007 (PDT)

I'm confused by the Terrestrial Circle Sorcery comment. "Costs 1wp as normal" makes it sound like a house rule. I don't own the DB book, so I don't know if it's actually errata or just looks odd. -MurderMunkey

Yes it's official errata. It means that the cost of the charm listed in the book has been removed as it was a mistake, but that the normal cost of 1wp to cast sorcery hasn't been removed.
--Bazzalisk 02:24, 14 October 2007 (PDT)


That's everything with a dev. answer copied from the WW wiki (unless I've missed something). --Kath 04:13, 14 October 2007 (PDT)

Hi - first attempt at using this wiki, so I hope I get it right... Anyway - I have a couple of questions about the errata for the DB stuff. Firstly - What's the Damage level on the Wood Aspect poison (p122)? I'm guessing Lethal, but it's not explicit. Secondly, for the Second Excellency (p128), the errata listed appears to say the same as the second sentence in the book anyway - or is the errata referring to the maximum spend for unrolled uses of the relevant Ability, as that implies you can spend twice as many motes as rolled uses will allow? Can anyone help me clarify? Thanks. --Jimfer 06:57, 18 December 2007 (PST)

EDIT - I've seen the answer to the Second Excellency question on the WW Official Wiki.--Jimfer 07:42, 18 December 2007 (PST)